Gian Moore compares modular construction with traditional construction. He says modular building is often faster, can be more affordable, and offers better control over quality and weather risk.
| Topic | Traditional construction | Modular construction |
|---|---|---|
| Build process | Foundations, walls, roof, then interior work and snagging on site. | Site foundations are laid while the building is assembled in a factory, including finishes and services. |
| Completion | Snag-list is completed near the end on site. | Snag-list is completed at the factory before delivery. |
| Time | Slower. | On average, 50% quicker. |
| Budget | Can be more exposed to delays and waiting for materials. | Can be more affordable, with shorter build time and fewer dead spots in the process. |
| Weather and vandalism | More exposed to weather and vandalism. | Less risk because major work happens in a factory. |
| Health, safety, and quality | Less controlled site conditions. | Factory conditions allow greater control and improvement. |
| Environment | Typically more disruptive on site. | More energy-efficient, less waste, more sustainable materials, lower carbon footprint from fewer site journeys. |
| Community impact | More noise, traffic, mess, and disruption. | Less disruptive to the community. |
| Living costs | Not specified. | Cheaper to heat and maintain; no repainting or surface repairs required. |
| Flexibility | Late design changes are easier. | Can be expanded, relocated, or reused, but late changes are harder and client sign-off is needed earlier. |
Gian Moore is a partner at Mellowpine. He is described as a master DIY’er, interior designer, and home improvement expert.